|
Working through 2024 Census data stage by stage — income, then direct taxes, then tax credits and SNAP, then healthcare — the 11.1-to-1 gap between Kansas's top and bottom fifth falls to about 5.3-to-1. Progressive taxes do most of that work before a single benefit check goes out.
Then the essay runs the same math for Britain, using the UK's own official statistics. Britain redistributes more aggressively than America does — but the two systems get there through very different machinery, and the final gap between Kansas and Britain turns out to be far narrower than either side of the debate assumes.
None of that settles whether more redistribution is a good idea. That's about cost and incentives, and the essay says so directly. What it does settle is the number everyone starts with.
|
"A household in the bottom fifth doesn't become more prosperous merely because a household in the top fifth pays more tax."
— Josh Dambacher
|
A Kansas family doesn't live inside an inequality ratio. It lives on what its resources can buy — which is exactly where the next essay in this series picks up. The full calculation and both tables are in this week's essay.
|
Also from The Plains Ledger
|
|